top of page

This page is going to talk about the unfair treatment that urban Chinese women face even if they successfully enter the labour market and get a comparatively stable jobs in the tertiary field other than agriculture and manufacturing in the cities of China.

China

Multiple burdens

Not because of laziness, opposingly, because of rigid social grouping and sexual discrimination, women can only depend on their family when they are untouched by further development in their career path. Cultural and systematic elements also prevent them from development. Despite the economic liberation of modern Chinese women, the cultural cage is still a limitation for most of them (Ke, 2012).

In Chinese culture, marriage is important to women. Especially in the old days, marriage is the destiny for grown up female, if not they would be seen as the burden in the maternal family, since they were considered to be not reproductive or not productive, unless they can find a good husband who has plenty of money to take care of his wife’s family.

The collective thinking among Chinese is rigid. The honour of one person can be seen as the honour of the whole family. And, the honour of one family can be the pride of a whole village. As a result, for marriage, women are going to be responsible for herself and also her family. It is believed that parents would have face if their girls could marry men with money or career. Therefore, somehow, they would be discussed by the others within the neighbourhood by how virtuous they behave, how they treat their mother-in-law and most importantly, how many boys they bear for her husband family, etc. They also need to endure the pressure from the community. If any rumour rises, the reputation of both of the families will be affected.

Even nowadays, despite of parental decided marriage, it is not difficult to hear that working female are asked when they would get marriage or have children. Besides, the wife usually the side faces the dilemma of work-family conflicts within a family. According to Burkitt (2013), a portion of women feel apologetic for not being able to take care of the families or find a true love on one hand. But, there are also some of them are forced to give up their work, since cultural elements are deep-rooted in their mind. The government as the leader bringing harmony to the society should discuss how to make women strive for a better life.

“The main issue we face is confusion, about who we are and what we should be,” said Qin Liwen, a magazine columnist. “Should I be a ‘strong woman’ and make money and have a career, maybe grow rich, but risk not finding a husband or having a child? Or should I marry and be a stay-at-home housewife, support my husband and educate my child? Or, should I be a ‘fox’ — the kind of woman who marries a rich man, drives around in a BMW but has to put up with his concubines?”(Tatlow, 2010).

Access to social security

Under the regulation of retirement, the women retirement age is five years earlier than that of men. Women have to leave their job earlier than men. This may stop the employers to promote women to higher position, in long term, it would also increase the burden of the social welfare system (Han, 2006).

 

Working environment

The permission for birth

Despite the fact that urban women are totally freed from assigned jobs for life and the control on marriage from work units, all ladies have to request the approval for having a kid.

The saying is based on the situation that many employers are choosing not to use women in an economy where there is an oversupply of labor due tothe inevitable costs imposed on themselves. Women are perceived as creating additional expense in the form of maternity leave and childbirth costs. Child-rearing is generally believed as the responsibility of women, that’s why male employee is more preferable than female. Meanwhile, feminists are asking for a system of state-supported childbirth insurance to reduce discrimination (Tatlow, 2010).

 

The obstacle to be civil servant

Since 2005, women are required to have invasive testing for sexually transmitted diseases and malignant tumours if they apply for civil service jobs. Nonetheless, information on their menstrual cycles is needed to be provided to the department (Kaiman, 2012).

"Sexually transmitted diseases can't be transmitted at work, so we think it's unnecessary to test for them – and the tumour examinations, these are unnecessary as well."

It seems the unreasonable requirements for applying for the position of civil services are unfair to the women. They are being hindered to get the job.

 

Women power up? Not yet

As a whole, the organizations recorded on the Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges shows a moderate expansion of the scope of female board seats of 0.3%, from 3.7% in 1997 to 4% in 2010, while women made up only 5.6% of CEOs in 2010.

Despite the continuing contribution of Chinese women in corporate settings, they are kept under official control among Chinese companies especially at the state-owned enterprises (SOEs), yet the Chinese government’s official view women are just as capable as men in the workplace. They made up 5.4% of non-SOE board chairs in 2010, but just 2.9% of them are on the board seats at SOEs, and they filled 10% of director seats in SOEs, compared with 13.7% at non-SOEs. The divergence can be clearly displayed by the proportion of women at the CEO level, it jumped to 8.2% and fell to 3.6% of chiefs at non-SOEs and SOEs respectively in the same period from 1997 to 2010 (Korn, 2012).

 

Reference:

Tatlow, D, K. (2010, November 30). For China’s women, more opportunities, more pitfalls. The New York Times, p.A18.

 

Kaiman, J. (2012). Chinese women protest at gynaecology checks for civil service jobs. Retrieved November 12, 2013 from http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/28/china-women-gynaecology-job-test?CMP=twt_gu.

 

Ke, Q. T. (2012). Women's rights stuck in mire of outdated values. Retrieved November 22, 2013 from http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/736978.shtml.

 

Korn, M. (2012). China’s corporate women get little love at state firms. Retrieved November 23, 2013 from http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2012/10/04/chinas-corporate-women-get-little-love-at-state-firms/.

 

Burkitt, L. (2013). No consensus: China debate on women’s roles. Retrieved November 22, 2013 from http://blogs.wsj.com/chinarealtime/2013/09/13/women-leadership-in-china-gender-equality-obstacles-female-roles-in-society/.

 

Han, N. (2006). 調整顯示八成女生應聘遭遇性別歧視。[Eight out of 10 girls feel discrimination from potential employers]Retrieved November 11, 2013 from http://news.sina.com.cn/c/edu/2006-04-05/03459532085.shtml.

© 2023 by Dawkins & Dodger Architecture. Proudly created with Wix.com

  • facebook
  • Twitter Round
  • googleplus
  • flickr
bottom of page